Blessed

The blessed of the Beatitudes, I have always described “blessed” as a statement of being, as a follower/disciple of Christ, one is blessed, we are!

I found a very interesting break down of the Greek word makarios, which is the word Matthew uses for blessed in the Beatitudes here at: http://www.crossmarks.com/brian/allsaintb.htm . The word in various context took on different meanings. Below is what I found about this word that is so critical for us to understand if we are to understand the Beatitudes and the message of The Sermon on the Mount as a whole. Below is what I found on the web site that I have linked above, I included it so that you can verify this information first hand, plus to give credit where credit is due, the authors name and contact information is listed on the link.

___________________________________________________________________________________

In ancient Greek times, makarios referred to the gods. The blessed ones were the gods. They had achieved a state of happiness and contentment in life that was beyond all cares, labors, and even death. The blessed ones were beings who lived in some other world away from the cares and problems and worries of ordinary people. To be blessed, you had to be a god.

Makarios took on a second meaning. It referred to the “dead”. The blessed ones were humans, who, through death, had reached the other world of the gods. They were now beyond the cares and problems and worries of earthly life. To be blessed, you had to be dead. That is the origin of the different saints days — they are remembered on the dates of their deaths. All Saints Day was for all the people who had died in the faith whose names we didn’t know.

Finally, in Greek usage, makarios came to refer to the elite, the upper crust of society, the wealthy people. It referred to people whose riches and power put them above the normal cares and problems and worries of the lesser folk — the peons, who constantly struggle and worry and labor in life. To be blessed, you had to be very rich and powerful.

When this word, makarios was used in the Greek translation of the Old Testament, it took on another meaning. It referred to the results of right living or righteousness. If you lived right, you were blessed. Being blessed meant you received earthly, material things: a good wife, many children, abundant crops, riches, honor, wisdom, beauty, good health, etc. A blessed person had more things and better things than an ordinary person. To be blessed, you had to have big and beautiful things.

In all of these meanings, the “blessed” ones lived in a higher plane than the rest of us. They were gods. They were humans who had gone to the world of the gods. They were the wealthy, upper crust. They were those with many possessions. The blessed were those people and beings who lived above the normal cares, problems, and worries of normal people.

Matthew (reflecting Jesus’ thoughts) uses this word in a totally different way. It is not the elite who are blessed. It is not the rich and powerful who are blessed. It is not the high and mighty who are blessed. It is not the people living in huge mansions or expensive penthouses who are blessed. Rather, Jesus pronounces God’s blessings on the lowly: the poor, the hungry, the thirsty, the meek, the mourning. Throughout the history of this word, it had always been the other people who were considered blessed: the rich, the filled up, the powerful. Jesus turns it all upside-down. The elite in God’s kingdom, the blessed ones in God’s kingdom, are those who are at the bottom of the heap of humanity.

COMMENTS FROM OTHERS ABOUT MAKARIOS

Boring (Matthew, New Interpreter’s Bible) has some significant comments about beatitudes:

Neither Jesus nor Matthew invented the beatitude form, which occurs in the Old Testament and in both Jewish and pagan literature. Jesus and early Christianity, including Matthew, reflect the use of beatitudes in the Jewish tradition, where they are found primarily in two settings: wisdom and prophecy. The setting gives the form a distinctive function and meaning: In the wisdom tradition, makarisms declare the blessing of those in fortunate circumstances, based on observation and experience (e.g., Sir 25:7-9), and declare their present reward and happiness. In the Prophets [and I would also include Apocalypses, BS] makarisms declare the present/future blessedness of those who are presently in dire circumstances, but who will be vindicated at the eschatological coming of God’s kingdom (Isa 30:18; 32:20; Dan 12:12). In the New Testament outside the synoptics, most beatitudes are found in the prophetic book of Revelation (1:3; 14:13; 16:15; 19:9; 20:6; 22:7, 14). [NOTE: I would not call Revelation a “prophetic book,” but apocalyptic literature — there are significant differences in genres.]

… Matthew’s beatitudes are not practical advice for successful living, but prophetic declarations made on the conviction of the coming-and-already-present kingdom of God. this perspective calls for the following hermeneutical corollaries:

(1) The beatitudes declare an objective reality as the result of a divine act, not subjective feelings, and thus should be translated with the objective “blessed” instead of the subjective “happy.” The opposite of “blessed” is not “unhappy,” but “cursed” (cf. Matt 25:31-46; Luke 6:24-26).

(2) The indicative mood should be taken seriously, and not transformed into an imperative of exhortation. …

(3) There is, however, an ethical dimension to the beatitudes. The community that hears itself pronounced blessed by its Lord does not remain passive, but acts in accord with the coming kingdom. …

(4) The beatitudes are written in unconditional performative language. They do not merely describe something that already is, but bring into being the reality they declare. … As eschatological blessings, the beatitudes are not “entrance requirements” for outsiders, but a declaration about insiders. …

(5) Understood as a prophetic pronouncement, the truth claim of the beatitude is not independently true, but dependent on the speaker. … The beatitudes, therefore, are not observations about reality that others of lesser insight had simply overlooked, such as the truths of mathematics or logic. They are true on the basis of the authority of the one who speaks. … In the first words of the Sermon on the Mount, we do not meet general statements, the truth of which we can investigate on our own terms, with our own criteria, but a veiled, implicit christological claim that calls for taking a stand with regard to the speaker, not merely the content of his speech.

(6) The beatitudes are not historical but eschatological. …

(7) The nine pronouncements are thus not statements about general human virtues — most appear exactly the opposite to common wisdom. Rather, they pronounce blessing on authentic disciples in the Christian community All the beatitudes apply to one group of people, the real Christians of Matthew’s community. They do not describe nine different kinds of good people who get to go to heaven, but are nine declarations about the blessedness, contrary to all appearances, of the eschatological community living in anticipation of God’s reign. Like all else in Matthew, they are oriented to life together in the community of discipleship, not to individualistic ethics. … [pp. 176-178]

A sermon title that I have used in the past is “Just Because I Said So,” that phrase all parents said that they would never use, but find themselves saying it. Why are these people blessed? Just because God said so. God’s word has the power to create what is said.

_________________________________________________________________________________

I could, I guess just have included the link and said go find this information for yourself, but I did want to save you a little work by including it here.

The conclusion for me based on this article and my previous study of The Sermon on the Mount from other resources has lead me to believe that I am right in my thinking that the Beatitudes are objective statements of being for disciples of Jesus; this is who you are, this blessedness is a gift of God empowered by the Holy Spirit. We could never be this way on our own, but with the indwelling Spirit, is not only a possibility but also a reality for those for who have died to self and now live for Christ.

Note:

As I have been thinking about this a lot lately the words “I am” keep popping in my head, as most of you no doubt know that “I am” is a name that God ascribed to himself in Exodus 3:14 (I AM who I AM). The declaration for the Christian is “I am” blessed, it is indeed a statement of being, of being Christ like in my devotion to God in the power of the Spirit whom He has given me. While the declaration is personal, it is most efficiently lived out in power of community, the community of believers who declare that they are The Body of Christ (The Church), they are salt and they are light, they are a city on a hill, the brighter the light shines, then more will see it and give glory to our Father who is in heaven, then even more can and will walk in the blessedness of the Beatitudes; this is who we are, we are a people who are blessed.

2 And he opened his mouth and taught them, saying:

3 “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

4 “Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted.

5 “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.

6 “Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be satisfied.

7 “Blessed are the merciful, for they shall receive mercy.

8 “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.

9 “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.

10 “Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness’ sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

11 “Blessed are you when others revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account. 12 Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven, for so they persecuted the prophets who were before you.

Matthew 5:2-12

We are blessed because Jesus says we are, and that is the only reason we ever need to give to anyone.

Advertisements

A Child’s Worth is not determined by their Intellect or by their Nationality

A month or so ago as I was sitting in a Community Leaders meeting facilitated by our local school district; we were discussing numbers and statistics concerning how our children are graded and how those ranking dictate how the district is doing in educating the children in their charge. These rankings are very important because they can determine whether or not the district will lose control of a school to the state, which means it becomes no longer a community school, but a state run school. But more importantly to me it means that we are telling our children whom we love that once again they have failed. Toward the end of the meeting, someone stood up to share a statement that has been burning in my mind and heart every since I heard it. The statement was: “A child’s worth is not determined by their intellect.” I stand in agreement with the statement, it seems as though the smarter (intellectual capacity wise) our children are, the more resources and funding become available to them to help them become more productive adults, but children who struggle more due to not being as intellectual and whose circumstances of life make it very difficult for them to learn, seem to be punished or pushed to the background as not good enough, being told in essence that you are not worth the effort or resources that can help you over the circumstances of your life: their is no hope for you. I know this sounds overly dramatic, but we are talking about our children here, isn’t that important. It seems as though we are telling them that only the strong and intellectual will survive it you can’t cut the mustard you will simply be left behind. Has not history taught us the atrociousness of such thinking, have we become mad?

Just yesterday as I was watching a news program listening to people debate the morality of the use of drone missile attacks in the war on terror, I became physically ill as I heard one those arguing say: “The bottom line in the end is whose four-year-old gets killed?” Whose four year olds get killed, we send a drone aircraft to drop bombs on an area or building in order to kill sometimes just one really bad person and whoever else might happen to there as innocent as they might be (including children) and they are just chalked up as collateral damage. Innocent four year old children as collateral damage, it sickens me to think of this, are not children and and the other innocents more than collateral damage, are they not people like you and me, who are we to determine whose children are more worthy, I do agree with the commentator who said: “The Drone Program is going to cause the U.S problems in the future.”

I personally believe that it is part of a reality that already is true, part of of reality in our own country where in our education system this mentality already exist to a degree, we tell our own children (by our actions) that if you don’t stack up that is just to bad, we will support the ones who do. Are we not making these children who don’t stack up just collateral damage and in much the same way, we launch our rules and guidelines at them in a sterile environment away from the community’s where these children live, we don’t have to see their faces, we just want to see the results, those left behind are just collateral damage.

To me all children everywhere are more than just collateral damage, they are people who deserve to loved, who deserve to be given a chance to live life to it fullest, they are our future, all of them.

Have we gone mad?

“There is nothing greater than love. There is nothing more holy than love. There is nothing more true than love, nothing more real. So let us hand our lives over to love and seal the bond of love.” Eberhard Arnold

Love is what our children need, love is what all children need. They need not only to hear but see that they are loved. To our children: “You are worthy; you are loved.”